Utah Valley
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
609  Seth Gutzwiller JR 33:02
686  Tyson Lambert FR 33:09
734  Logan Petty SO 33:14
812  Trac Norris JR 33:21
849  Chris Brower JR 33:25
1,018  Trevor Sharp SR 33:41
1,285  Brenden Emery SO 34:02
1,645  Jadyn Asay SO 34:30
1,741  Rush Mills SO 34:38
National Rank #116 of 311
Mountain Region Rank #13 of 18
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 12th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 13.4%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Seth Gutzwiller Tyson Lambert Logan Petty Trac Norris Chris Brower Trevor Sharp Brenden Emery Jadyn Asay Rush Mills
Color County Invitational 10/10 1171 32:58 33:52 34:29 34:09
Bronco Invitational 10/18 1045 33:02 32:40 33:30 33:16 33:01 33:47 34:02 34:24 34:45
WAC Championships 11/01 1116 33:31 33:37 33:16 33:08 33:25 33:30 33:21 34:28 34:46
Mountain Region Championships 11/14 1081 32:33 33:04 33:43 33:52 33:30 34:40





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.7 330 0.0 0.0 0.4 13.0 28.2 32.8 24.4 1.2 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Seth Gutzwiller 58.8
Tyson Lambert 62.6
Logan Petty 65.0
Trac Norris 69.3
Chris Brower 71.1
Trevor Sharp 78.4
Brenden Emery 87.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 0.0% 0.0 8
9 0.4% 0.4 9
10 13.0% 13.0 10
11 28.2% 28.2 11
12 32.8% 32.8 12
13 24.4% 24.4 13
14 1.2% 1.2 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0